August 22, 2026 — image provenance and the 06:16 frame
Removed two in-house editorial reconstructions, the previous generated hero, and the previous generated social card. Current editorial images now come from Game Science’s official project materials or linked public-domain museum records; interface diagrams remain clearly separate from evidence images.
Revised the 06:16 combat description. The available frame supports fire and a red vertical form, but does not clearly establish paper edges, writing, an item identity, or a talisman mechanic. Related homepage, atlas, status, and knowledge-page wording now preserves that uncertainty.
What counts as a correction
A correction changes a factual statement, attribution, date, translation, source link, rights note, or evidence label. Typographic changes that do not alter meaning may be fixed without a separate entry.
When new official material answers an open question, the page is updated as a new confirmation rather than treating the earlier unknown status as an error.
How revisions are recorded
Material changes receive an updated date and a short note describing what changed. Active project facts are also reflected in the Project Status change log. Historical pages distinguish newly added context from a correction to an earlier claim.
The sitemap lastmod value should change only when the page receives a substantive revision. Cosmetic deployments should not make every page look newly updated.
How to report a problem
Record the page URL, the exact sentence or image, the proposed correction, and a primary or authoritative source that supports it. If the link reached you through a platform or shared task, use that same channel to send the correction packet to the publisher.
A public inbox is not advertised during this beta because the site does not collect personal information or submissions. This page will list any future public contact channel before it is used.
Correction standard
A correction is accepted because the evidence is stronger, not because a more exciting interpretation is popular. Disputed cultural claims may be rewritten to show the disagreement rather than choosing a single tradition as universal.
If a claim cannot be verified, it is removed or relabelled as uncertain. The goal is a transparent record that remains useful after the surrounding news cycle has moved on.